Terrell Owens He Has $0 Monthly Income, Pays $500K Yearly to 4 Baby Mamas


It is hard to feel sorry for T.O.

Having one kid with a woman you have no plans on being with is a mistake, having four is a trend. Secondly, Owens just in NFL salaries has collected well over $50 million dollars.

That isn’t counting endorsements, appearances and television roles.

There is no way he should be broke, but according to these child support documents he isn’t doing very well financially. TMZ breaks it down.

Terrell Owens’ financial situation is so dire, he filed papers in three separate child support cases to have his payments lowered … because he makes ZERO DOLLARS … this according to court docs obtained by TMZ.

Baby Mama #1, Monique Reynolds

T.O. and Monique have an 11-year-old son together. According to the papers, he paid $20,000/month in support until last year, when it was reduced to $11,202. He also gave her $100,000 to buy a house.

Baby Mama #2, Kimberly Floyd

They share a 7-year-old daughter, for whom TO was ordered to pay $20,000/month for back in 2005. In 2008, they agreed to drop that to $15,000.

Baby Mama #3, Samelia Miller

Miller gave birth to a son back in 2006. He was ordered to pay $13,400/month in support.

Baby Mama #4, Melanie Paige Smith

T.O. was ordered to pay $5,000/month for their daughter back in 2007. This is the only case where T.O. has not yet requested a reduction … though his rep says he plans to ask for a modification.

In each of the cases where T.O. is requesting a reduction in child support payments, he says in his declaration, “My currently monthly income is zero ($0).”

In the papers, T.O. also claims to pay $62,366/month for various properties and says his home in Georgia is in foreclosure. He says he put all but two of his homes up for sale.

Before I get back to T.O., I must say something has to be done about the Child Support laws in our country.  Having a child by an athlete or entertainer shouldn’t be seen as an instant paycheck.  The $5000 a month that Melanie Paige Smith was receiving at the height of Owens’ prime isn’t that unreasonable.

But the $20k Monique Reynolds was getting with the $100k house is ridiculously.   You don’t need almost a quarter of a million dollars to raise a kid especially when Ms. Reynolds has never caught a pass in her life.

Are we talking Child Support or Baby Mama support?  Because it is two different things.

The rules should be that to receive child support the mother is actively seeking employment not “living” off the child support.  Monthly they should have to submit an expense report on the things they have purchased to take care of their child.  Every six months the amount should be reviewed and audits should be done on the mother’s spending.

Trust me a lot of women are using child support money for trips to Vegas and gifts on their new man.  Our government needs to clean that up.

Back to Owens.


He has made some awful financial decisions and it is now catching up to him.  I doubt that he isn’t making any money, I still see him on TV, but I am pretty confident he doesn’t have the ability to pay over half million in child support over twelve months when he can’t stop any of his own houses from going into foreclosures.

I hope young athletes (Dez Bryant yeah I am talking to you) see what happened to Owens and use it as a learning tool, you can’t ball forever start planning for retirement right now.

Oh one last thing, almost remember……………..



  1. While your on the topic what about Nas paying Kelis 55k a month for their son! and 22 of that is for spousal support wtf she retire from 1 hit wonders?

  2. Government workers can barely keep the child support system’s red tape untangled as is.

    The author wants MORE paternalistic government intervention to protect UNsophisticated millionaire men from exploitative women and nonmarital minor children? Govt workers should supervise monthly audits for millions of fractured families? They should track who spent how much on what and when? MONTHLY? They’ll expect extra salary for these extra services rendered. It’s all on the taxpayers’ dime?
    Not even the IRS does THAT much hand holding.

    Uncle Sam is not millionaire TO’s personal money manager. Uncle Sam won’t run TO’s households & manage TO’s finances just cuz Owens was a sucker for 4 diff women (none of whom he married).

    TO didn’t plan well. He could have paid smart financial advisers early in his career to warn him against gold-diggers and bad business ventures and mooching friends/family. Owens failed to heed warnings. Now he supports 5+ households at the NFL-rich standard of living / quality of life.

  3. Tragic. To quote: “Our government needs to clean that up.”

    T.O. is a man. He needs to start acting like one. It is not the responsiblity of our taxpayers/government to act as his or any other persons’ accountant, moral compass, or financial advisor.

    Your remark of “our government needs” reinforces the stereotype of “blacks” on welfare and always needing to be corrected, taught, or just helped because they can’t help themselves.

    I know what you meant “the system is broken needs to be fixed”; however, put into proper context (T.O., four kids, four differenet partners) now, what part of “needs a fixin” would you care to rephrase–the broken government part or T.O.?

    • T.O needs a fixing? That wouldn’t make sense if the women are indeed gold diggers. Their main purpose is leeching, and that includes using children to do so. If you are persistent w/ not including government intervention, than the process of child support should be removed altogether. The purpose in child support is designated towards helping the children, and not the women. Alimony is designated towards the support of a former spouse, but none of the women are ex-wives. Child supports services should be turned into a savings program where both parents have no access to the money.

Comments are closed.