I don’t understand how some of these lawsuits are allowed to continue. I also don’t understand why the woman’s name is being protected when she is falsely accusing someone of rape.
I have more questions, but here are the details via CBS LA.
The woman’s lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in May 2013 against both Young and the Crown Bar. Her attorneys, however, filed an amended complaint one month later, in which the establishment no longer appeared as a defendant.
The woman, who is identified in her complain only as Jane Doe, accused Young of battery, sexual battery, assault, sexual assault, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence in her new lawsuit.
The woman did have sex with someone while she was passed out, but it wasn’t Swaggy P, which is why he was never charged or arrested in the matter.
Cochran states in court papers, which were filed in September 2013, that genetic testing disproves the woman’s claims that Young had sex with her.
“Mr. Young met with police, provided information without invoking his right to remain silent and gave a genetic sample for DNA testing,” Cochran’s statement read. “The DNA analyzed by police does not match Mr. Young. Proven innocent, Mr. Young was neither arrested nor charged with any crime, based on (the) plaintiff’s story.”
So, what happened was the woman decided when it doubt just blame Swaggy P, that is really unfair and she needs to be arrested for filing a false report.