
Coming off his spectacular NCAA Tournament performance, a lot of people are debating if Stephen Curry should turn pro? I think we all know what his limitations are. He is a 6'2" (probably more like 6 Feet") shooting guard with a body of McLovin from the movie "SuperBad."
What position does he play in the pros? Does he handle the ball well enough to be a Point Guard? Defensively how would he hold up against physical opposition? With all these questions you would think the easy answer would be to stay in school, get a little stronger, and solidify his draft status.
But history tells us that, sometimes, it is best to strike while the iron is hot. It is quite possible that his draft stock is as high as it is ever going to be. What if Davidson has an off year next year? What if Davidson gets knocked out in the 1st round of the tournament with him going 3-20? While I think it is admirable that he wants to remain in school, I believe that a lot more bad things can happen than good things by staying.
One more year isn't going to change the fact that the kid can play. Chris Paul, and even going farther back to A.I,. have shown us that you don't have to be a 6'6" guard to be dominant in the NBA. However, NBA GMs are very similar to gold digging women. They have a "What have you done for me lately?" mentality when it comes to prospects. Steph may want to call Roy Hibbert and ask him how it worked out for him after staying in school to improve his game.























































