Memo to ESPN, Golf Channel, CBS and etc: "It's difficult to win a golf tournament and Tigger (yes, I know it is Tiger but I like calling him Tigger) Woods isn't Superman no matter how much you want him to be."
The fact that he has won 13 majors is remarkable at such a young age. But, the odds are still more likely that he will lose than win. So when I saw graphics like Tigger was 4 to 2 to win the Grand Slam of Golf, I laughed and put $100 down on his not winning the Masters and $100 on his not winning the Grand Slam. Guess who is going to the bank tomorrow? I understand that Tigger is the PGA money-maker. Let's not fool ourselves. The PGA would be an afterthought without him, but he is still much more likely to lose than win no matter how much they try to make you think otherwise.
