The internet is packed with scoopers on Marvel content. There’s a sea of people who appear or claim to have some connection to the production side of Marvel, and that makes a lot of sense. These productions are international in nature, and with thousands of people involved, you’re bound to have people who are happy to talk about what they’re doing behind the scenes, NDAs be damned. It’s not like they can track the source of most of these rumors, either. That said, some scoopers stand out above others, and today we’re here to talk about the undisputed king of Marvel scooping, DanielRPK.
As someone who has spoken to Daniel RPK extensively in the past, I know the kind of work he puts into his scoops. I also know that he does it because he loves it. Sure, he makes a decent living doing this, but so do all of us. When Daniel speaks, I listen, and I certainly listen to him over anti-woke grifters, who cry about everything, and that brings us to the crux of our story.
‘AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY’ will reportedly feature multiple Doctor Dooms.
Including female variants.
(via @DanielRPK) pic.twitter.com/ZRfzVeoESd
— Cosmic Marvel (@cosmic_marvel) November 9, 2025
Recently, DanielRPK shared that the upcoming Avengers: Doomsday movie would feature multiple variants of Doctor Doom, including a female Doom. This brings us to Nerdrotic, the grifter in question, who claims that no such thing will take place in the film. Keep in mind, this is the same guy who doesn’t even know what a “legacy character” is in Marvel. Yep, this guy thinks a “legacy character” is the original hero. This is a dude who used to run a comic shop, and he doesn’t even know how to use the term legacy character properly.
He also frequently releases videos decrying black characters and how nobody actually cares about them. He uses cherry-picked and out-of-context data that doesn’t hold up to any form of scrutiny. Most of his content relies on his audience already agreeing with his position and having no interest in actually verifying his claims. You know, the type of people who tell you to do your own research. There’s a solid video by Th3Birdman on this exact topic, if you wish. It’s very much related to the content we’re discussing here today.
I’ll never get over the fact that the biggest tell for these grifters is their misuse of “legacy character”.
This is like saying “Shohei Ohtani scored a touchdown” or saying chickens ‘quack’
It’s such a basic mistake that immediately outs them as tourists https://t.co/fD38L6kkU8
— Th3Birdman (@Th3birdman15) May 11, 2025
DanielRPK has a literal novel of prior work that can be checked and verified. While he doesn’t land every scoop correctly, he’s right more often than he’s wrong, and even when he’s wrong, you can see that the plans were changed mid-stream and what he was reporting might have been the original plan. That’s just the nature of production, and trying to keep the audience guessing. We’ve heard of directors changing stories or changing endings because the original ending was spoiled, and they refused to have their movie spoiled, too. One person is a reliable reporter and a solid journalist; the other is a grifter who runs a YouTube outrage mill. They report, you decide.
The idea of multiple Doom variants would honestly fit in well with the limited knowledge we do have on this production. It definitely seems centered on the older characters from pre-MCU days, and finding a way to take content that was never intended to blend with the current product, and turn it into a seamless bit of lore and world-building. We’ve already seen some variants in the MCU. Hell, we had an entire show about two variants working together in Loki. This saga is about the multiverse and the variants within, so a bunch of different Doctor Dooms makes a whole bunch of sense, but that’s not all.
One thing our grifter might never have considered before full-throatedly calling DanielRPK a liar is the concept of Doombots. If you’re unfamiliar, let me catch you up on the lore. There have been countless times where people thought they killed Dr. Doom, only to discover they had ended the existence of a robot called a Doombot. Disney has a great animatronics department, but something tells me that they would use real humans for the Doombots, and that could lead to all sorts of different actors and actresses being cast in the role of a robot.
Dr. Doom loved to use carbon copies of himself to rule different areas of the world. Oftentimes, people don’t even know that they’re dealing with a Doombot, as these things are advanced enough to bleed and sweat. One of my favorite short stories is “Doctor Doom: Books of Doom” by Ed Brubaker. It explores the entire life of Doom, from birth to the present day — and also incorporates the Doombots in a way that surprises and delights. I won’t spoil the series, but I will say it’s a great, short read for anyone looking for more about Dr. Doom before Avengers: Doomsdays‘ release.
I think the reporting makes sense, the more you look at the central cast of the upcoming film. While the Multiverse Saga hasn’t been the follow-up to the Infinity Saga that Disney and Marvel had hoped for, they’re determined to bring the story to a close in an epic way. There’s a reason the Russo Brothers were brought back and why they brought everyone back, including Chris Evans. They’re going to do what it takes to tell the story in a way that makes sense, but also accomplishes their storytelling goals. If that means they need a female Doctor Doom, then they need one. It’s funny that the people who want to see the story told the way the story needs to be told also get upset when they find out the story is being told through a female or a black person. But then how else would you generate money if you didn’t have an outrage mill on YouTube?
Trust in RPK.
