Olivia Dunne has reacted to the New York Times article that her brand is regressive, exposing her body to grab massive numbers on social media for brand deals and money.
According to the Spun;
Olivia Dunne appears to be upset with the New York Times.
Earlier this week, the New York Times published a story about Name, Image and Likeness in women’s college sports, highlighting Dunne.
The LSU Tigers gymnast is one of the most popular athletes in college sports. She has millions of followers on social media and makes seven-figures through brand deals.
But the New York Times questioned if this is a good thing for women’s sports, considering the photos she posts on social media.
“New Endorsements for College Athletes Resurface an Old Concern: Sex Sells,” the story reads.
The New York Times story has been trending on social media throughout the week.
“Female college athletes are making millions thanks to their large social media followings. But some who have fought for equity in women’s sports worry that their brand building is regressive,” it reads.
Dunne appears to have caught wind of the story going viral on social media. She posted a photo (from the New York Times photoshoot) on her Instagram Story with a four-word message.
“Is this too much?” she wrote.
I am not sure why anyone would hate on someone making $2 million for some TikToks. It sounds more like jealousy and hate to me. If the New York Times writer could make $2 million from Instagram, they would. Dunne and any college athlete making money should feel no shame or guilt.
No one is forcing these brands to give these kids the money. They are doing it of their free will.
Don’t hate the player; hate the game.
Flip to the next page for Dunne clowning the New York Times and dropping more thirst traps. It should be noted that Dunne is an honor student at LSU.