The two main differences between R Kelly and Michael Jackson is that Kelly is still alive and Kelly has sex tapes to prove what he was doing with young girls.
I know a lot of Michael Jackson’s supporters say he was found not guilty of the crimes he was accused of, so was R Kelly, so that is a slippery slope to begin with.
I watched both documentaries, and I think another difference with Kelly and Jackson is with Kelly you have so many women who don’t know each other saying the same things throughout decades, so even if one is lying or exaggerating, it is hard to imagine they all are.
With Jackson, you have two main accusers who have changed their stories a lot over the years.
One thing I do agree with DL Hughley about is that is if Michael Jackson weren’t Michael Jackson just his general interaction with young boys would not be looked kindly upon. I am talking about the actions that Jackson admits to like sleeping in same bed with them while having little to no interaction with females.
You can come to your conclusions while checking out the video of DL speaking on it and Oprah talking to alleged victims.